

- MEMCPY BORLAND C++ FOR FREE
- MEMCPY BORLAND C++ HOW TO
- MEMCPY BORLAND C++ CODE
- MEMCPY BORLAND C++ WINDOWS
MEMCPY BORLAND C++ WINDOWS

This makes it easy to make manually corrections, if there are differently named Delphi constructors with the same signature.
MEMCPY BORLAND C++ CODE
The names of originally used constructors are inserted as comments into the translated code now, if the "Verbose" option is enabled and the name is not "Create".Both need the basic standard constructors. From now on, this only happens if the extended RTTI abilities are enabled, to use the TD2CObjects or the DECLARE_DYNAMIC and IMPLEMENT_DYNAMIC marcros. Previously also equally named overwritten constructors were added to the list. The calculation of the list of the constructors of the base classes, which can be accessed also in the derived class, was improved.An obvious alternative would be to use the macros "DECLARE_DYNCREATE" and "IMPLEMENT_DYNCREATE" also defined in the Microsoft Foundation Classes (MFC). The macros "DECLARE_DYNAMIC" and "IMPLEMENT_DYNAMIC" can be renamed by means of the substitution table of the translator now.Example:Ĭonstructor Base.Create(arg : Integer) _fastcall Base::Base( int arg ) This shift doesn't take place if the initialization depends on a condition. If there are such explicit initializations, then they are moved into the initialization list. Member variables are initialized in the initialization lists of the constructors with default values automatically now, if there aren't any explicit initializations in the body of the constructor. Class instances can be created from such class references by calling virtual constructor functions. Which delivers instances of class references in a similar way as the _classid function at C++Builder.

Documentation actualized, beta offer closedįor other compilers then C++Builder DelphiXE2Cpp11 supports a new pattern to create class references, which is much more nifty than that of the old Delphi2Cpp.
MEMCPY BORLAND C++ FOR FREE
Delphi2CB will be a low cost extract from DelphiXE2Cpp11 for users of C++Builder.ĭelphiXe2Cpp11 translation-service offer: 1000 lines of your code converted for free The actualized documentation already contains information to the planned programm Delphi2CB. Improved solution for the C ++ replication of module-wide visibility of class members in Delphi. Nested_reflexive = (int depth) -> boolĪdditional RTL files have been translated: :įunction nested_reflexive(depth :Integer) : boolean With this feature, DelphiXE2Cpp11 can be seen as the legitimate successor to Delphi2Cpp 1 and thus becomes Delphi2Cpp 2.0.įor recursively called nested functions, DelphiXE2Cpp11 now generates explicit forward declarations in C ++ instead of the error-causing auto routines.

Delphi2Cpp 1 already had this feature, but it was missing in DelphiXE2Cpp11 up to now. Parameters and variables of the outer function are passed to the extracted functions. Viewed 71 times 1 I have this example in C.For C++98, the inner functions are now extracted from nested functions so that they become class functions or normal free functions.
MEMCPY BORLAND C++ HOW TO
The problem resides in 2 places: how can I initialize a struct I've defined and how to do. I'm new to Go and I wish to translate some C/C++ code I have to Go but I haven't been able to.
